In this section
of the site you will find arguments for an against the use of
milk. It is important to understand the distinct difference between
traditional milk flowing from protected and loved cows, and commercial
milk that is forcibly extracted from exploited cows in industrialized
countries. But first, let's give some background on why some
FFL projects use milk products in their cooking.
Why Do Some
Food for Life Projects Use Milk?
| All
Food for Life projects serve vegan meals, however, some programs
do continue
to use commercial milk products. While Food for Life Global
is doing its best to discourage the use of commercial dairy
products, an explanation of the Hindu traditions that have
influenced ISKCON, the organization from which the Food for
Life program
was born, may help our supporters better understand why a
limited use
of
commercial
milk continues. |
|
Ancient Tradition
The
Hindu tradition is centered
on worship of Krishna, the "cowherd
boy," and the cow as "Mother." India’s
ancient culture has existed on cow's milk for tens of thousands
of years. Milk
is and always will be an integral part of that culture.
History has proven that cultures can survive for thousands
of years and their people live long, healthy lives when
there is a symbiotic relationship
between man and animal. Hundreds of millions of Hindus
have used
dairy products for many thousands of years, lending credibility
to the notion that dairy
products can be safe to consume. To ignore this fact is
to allow ourselves to be blinded by our reluctance to even consider
evidence that
challenges
our own personal convictions and the current medical
belief.
All Milk is Not The Same
It
is important to keep in mind that milk from each different source
is unique; that is, cow’s
milk and human milk are not one and the same. Taken further,
the milk that a brown cow produces is different from
that of a
spotted cow, and within each herd, every individual cow
has the ability to produce a
unique blend of milk for its calf.
Similarly, even among breast-feeding
women, the milk that each woman produces is not exactly the
same. By nature's wondrous
design, the milk that a mother produces for her child is perfectly
suited to that child. Amazingly, even while breast-feeding, a
mother's milk can change according to the needs of the child!
Obviously, a more subtle influence is present here—the
influence of love. In the same way, if a cow is loved and protected,
the milk it offers to humans will most certainly be uniquely
beneficial. On the other hand, the commercial milk that comes
from mistreated and diseased cows is certainly very harmful.
It's important to note that all dairy research is conducted on
commercial milk!
|
So although
vegans certainly have strong scientific evidence,
albeit, limited to the harmful
effects of commercial dairy products on humans,
we should also consider the overwhelming evidence
of one of the world's oldest cultures—Hinduism—and
be careful not to generalize that "all milk is the
same." It isn't. |
You
may be wondering, then, why I (a practicing Hindu)
decided to choose
a vegan diet. The first
reason is the same thing that motivates
most vegans: I am vehemently opposed to the vicious and cruel
commercial dairy industry that exploits cows. It is, most certainly,
hypocritical for any Hindu to support it. On the other hand,
I have no quarrel with people who love and care for a cow at
home or on a farm, and who accept the excess milk the cow offers
with love. (By the way, the generalization bandied about by some
vegans that a cow must be in calf to produce milk—is
not entirely true. Examples to the contrary include one cow
at the ISKCON Bhaktivedanta Manor in England that continued
to give milk 8 years after calf!!! How is that possible? The
cow felt loved, and so she continued to offer her milk with
love.
In a sense, I am a "conditional” vegan or
a "Krishna-Dairian"—a
new breed of conscious consumer, who will accept milk only
from loved and protected
cows, and NOT from those that are raised for slaughter, including
the cows at organic dairies (another hypocrisy of the modern
day).
The popular argument that any vegetarian
food blessed by God makes the food acceptable under any circumstances,
although weak from the material perspective, does have validity
from the spiritual perspective. All our food should be blessed
(offered to) by God as a humble act
of sacrifice. We come into this world with nothing, and we leave
the same. We own nothing, but are merely caretakers of all that
is bestowed on us from God. By offering our food back to God
before we eat it, we acknowledge our dependency. Such food is
consequently purified of any karma, hence the term "karma-free" food.
Because there is violence even in
the gathering and preparation of vegan meals, our food
is never totally karma-free,
or ahimsa (non-violent).
If, however, we offer our food to God first, it becomes pure,
antiseptic, and spiritually nourishing! Hindus call this food
prasada—or mercy.
By adopting this spiritual practice, the vegan movement will
further its quest for real peace and
harmony. Despite our good intentions, if we fail to recognize
God as the source of all good things, our efforts will remain
dry, mundane and inadequate.
So, although the above argument supporting
the use of commercial cow’s milk
by certain ISKCON members does have validity, it certainly
does not justify financially supporting the commercial dairy
industry by purchasing their products. A vegan’s
confusion in this regard, therefore, is completely justified.
Food
for Life Global encourages ISKCON members to adopt the ideal
standard outlined by its founder Srila
Prabhupada.
From the beginning
of the movement he started in 1966, he encouraged his students
to develop self-sufficient farms that could supply all their
needs,
completely
independent
of modern society, including commercial dairy. Thus far, as a
whole, ISKCON has not lived up to this ideal, although there
are exceptions, like the beautiful ISKCON project in Brazil,
called Gaura
Vrindavan, Care
for Cows in Vrindavan, Go
Seva project in ISKCON Mayapur
and many others.
The Challenge of Changing Tradition
Finally, in defence of ISKCON, it is important
to understand that it is not easy establishing an orthodox Hindu
culture in
decadent Western societies. It is even more difficult
to preserve the ancient traditions that influenced that culture.
While the problem of dairy consumption is a challenge for
many ISKCON followers, it is only one of many. For most members,
of far greater
importance
is the promotion of values and morals—such as celibacy,
non-violence,
and abstinence from all forms of intoxication and gambling—as
alternatives to a degraded world.
In any case, through Food for Life Global’s
educational outreach, as well through the efforts of the vegan
movement,
ISKCON is beginning to take a good look
at the issue of commercial milk. We are confident that in the
not-too-distant
future there will be a major paradigm shift, and a commercial-dairy-free
diet will at the very least be respected within ISKCON
communities.
Food for Life Global respects the vegan movement,
and welcomes and encourages its cooperation.
To that
end, we hope that this discussion of the unique cultural
challenges
faced by ISKCON and in part by Food for Life will inform
and enlighten.
By Paul Turner
Director
Food for Life Global
Comments
|